(not grounded in scientific research, lacking credibility & effectiveness, no meaningful + measurable improvements)
(most programs are one-size-fits-all not addressing the specific health needs or preferences of employees, leading to wasted resources and missed opportunities)
(lack of interest, motivation, personalization or ability to measure improvements and benefits)
(remote work options, flexible hours, etc.)
(lack of integrating actions into a long-term health strategy with regular follow-ups )
Most approaches are focusing on a given technology and/or device but do not bring together all approaches with medical evidence
They are generally designed in a “one-off way” with a minimum support model for 12 months and review the performance improvement over time
Similar approaches either do not provide concrete and personalized improvement recommendations that are considering a large majority of evidence-based approaches
Thanks to our latest technology, our approach is generally 30-50% cheaper than established ones which generally lack significant elements mentioned above